How long does it take to pull up the static html in your browser?
Just the browser render can be non-trivial for a large enough file.

Are you using arrays instead of collections and (where possible)
primatives instead of objects?  An int[100,250] is much smaller than a
comparably scaled List<List<Integer>>.

Scott


On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:30 AM,  <d...@agentlab.de> wrote:
> Surely a change in the use case would ease our lives, unfortunately we are
> migrating a legacy application to a new technology and the look and feel (if
> you could call it that) must be retained...
>
> J,
>
> Josh Chappelle wrote:
>>
>> Could you use a PageableListView or does that not fall within your
>> business
>> requirements?
>>
>> Josh
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: d...@agentlab.de [mailto:d...@agentlab.de] Sent: Wednesday, February
>> 17, 2010 12:08 PM
>> To: users@wicket.apache.org
>> Subject: Large number components and redering time
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question on how to address a certain problem that arose in my
>> current
>> project: we have a two-dimensional array with a variable number of rows
>> and
>> columns
>> (not exactly rocket science, I know) that needs to be rendered in an HTML
>> table where
>> each cell is currently represented by a wicket-Label. Now, in the
>> production
>> environment, the number of rows and columns gets quite large such that we
>> have roughly
>> 25.000 cells to render. This yields to the effect, that the rendering
>> process for the
>> component tree takes a lot of time: on my windows machine approx 7 seconds
>> and, for
>> some reason we have not found out about until now, on the integration
>> machine (IBM
>> server) around 45 seconds. Clearly, this is not acceptable.
>>
>> Now, my question is, how should we address this problem? Is the naive
>> approach of
>> using two nested ListViews and rendering each as component plain dumb?
>> What
>> would be
>> the alternatives?
>>
>> Thanks for any help,
>>
>> J.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>
> --
> Dr. Jürgen Lind
> www.agentlab.de
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to