Reinout wrote: > Op dinsdag 27-04-2010 om 16:20 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Jimi: > > > 2. Seems old. [wicket auth roles + WASP/SWARM] Found a two year old > > discussion labeled "is wicket-auth-roles discontinued?". And the > comments on > > the "Getting started with Swarm" wiki page is from 2007 and 2008, plus > that > > they talk about Acegi (the old name for Spring Security) and the project > has > > dependencies to Wicket 1.3 and Spring 2.0. > > This lives on as a wicket-stuff subproject. > Just yesterday a new version, 1.4rc1 was announced on this list: > > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/announce-Wicket-Security-1-4-rc1-released-tt2067350.html#a2067350
Interesting... I looked for postings about wicket security in this mailing list before that posting, during Monday, and when I wrote my posting yesterday I didn't think to look again to see if any more security related postings had come in. But apparently it had... =) Now I also found this posting about Wicket Security: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Future-of-Wicket-Security-WASP-SWARM-tt1908153.html#a1908153 And I tend to agree with the last post, by Antoine. Wicketstuff feels a bit like a playground, with production ready projects mixed with crude copy-paste-example projects. By the way, isn't http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security the "official" web site for it? Because it doesn't mention 1.4rc1 Regards /Jimi -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-security-what-are-the-best-options-Spring-Security-reached-almost-all-the-way-tp2068415p2069145.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
