That's why I'm wondering how common it is. Based on that e-mail discussion from 2006, a WicketRuntimeException was on the table, implying that a Page object should never be invisible. I guess a better question would be, what are the reasons for making a page invisible?
Jake Igor Vaynberg-2 wrote: > > log.warn would be annoying to people who are actually setting the > visibility to false > > -igor > -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Invisible-Page-Notification-tp2247626p2247742.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
