Hi Giovanni,

on what basis do you do the device recognition and classification?

Currently we are looking into wurfl http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/
Any opion on tha? Or do you know of an alternative to wurfl?

mf

2010/6/15 Joachim F. Kainz <j...@jolira.com>

> Giovanni,
>
> I am one of the developers of mobile.walmart.com. We are using Wicket to
> support all types of cell phones, but most of our traffic is from smart
> phones. If you point to our site using iPhone, Blackberry, and Motorola
> Razor you get three different experience. All three experiences are
> backed by the same Java code.
>
> We have nothing to do with visural wicket (even though at first glance
> it looks interesting). Our opensource components are at
> http://code.google.com/p/jolira-tools/
>
> Best regards,
>
> Joachim
> http://www.jolira.com
>
> On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 13:02 -0500, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>
> > There are many classes of smart phones available.  Some support n JS,
> some
> > very limited, while others support just about anything you can put in a
> > regular browser.  Because of this, you may use the same java code with
> three
> > or four different styles of markup so that each browser class has its own
> > markup.
> >
> > Search the list for "mobile.walmart.com" and see the post made by the
> guys
> > that created that site.  It talked about this.  They also released some
> open
> > source components - visural wicket.
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Giovanni <pino_o...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I need to write a web application which will be accessed via mobile
> > > browsers from smartphones.
> > >
> > > What are the smartphone browsers which work well with Wicket?
> > >
> > > What kind of attention should I pay during the development of Wicket
> > > applications for mobile devices?
> > >
> > > Is there any tutorial about developing Wicket applications for mobile
> > > target browsers?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance for any help.
> > >
> > > giovanni
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to