Coming up to speed in Wicket and see some things that I don't know how to
interpret regarding generics.
First, I have a form subclass that looks like this:
private class MyForm extends Form
Eclipse shows the following warning:
Form is a raw type. References to generic type Form<T> should be
parameterized.
I'd like to try and understand this. What could <T> possibly be?
Second, for some things, I'm questioning my understanding of either generics
or Wicket. Example:
TextField<String> foo = new TextField<String>( "foo", model );
But isn't "TextField" implying text (or a string). Would TextField<Integer>
make sense (haven't tried it yet)? If it makes sense, then maybe TextField
is just a bad name and TextField should be thought of as "Field"?
Just trying to get a grasp on generics in Wicket. Maybe my grasp on
generics isn't so hot either.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341004.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
