I also need a provider library, but just think it's strange that the
JPA API are bound into the provider library and a independent.

regards Nino

2010/9/9 Korbinian Bachl - privat <korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de>:
> Oh, didn't know that - thx :)
>
> in fact I haven't yet had any situation where I needed the JPA-API from
> maven but not any persistence library as well; Nino, for what is it good for
> in your case?
>
> Best
>
>
> Am 09.09.10 09:34, schrieb Jan Kriesten:
>>
>> Hi Korbinian,
>>
>>> in fact the current is 2.1.1, but 2.0.0 is reference implementation and
>>> for the JPA 2.0 API it wont matter what 2.0.x it is (see scope provided
>>> here - just API);
>>
>> actually, I meant the javax.persistence-API, which can be referenced
>> with eclipse:
>>
>>       <dependency>
>>         <groupId>org.eclipse.persistence</groupId>
>>         <artifactId>javax.persistence</artifactId>
>>         <version>2.0.2</version>
>>       </dependency>
>>
>> The current version there is 2.0.2. From the release notification:
>>
>> "The javax.persistence library has been updated in our repository and in
>> maven.
>>
>> The new version, 2.0.2, should address any issues people have had
>> related to some churn of previous versioned javax.persistence libraries
>> in our maven repository."
>>
>> Best regards, --- Jan.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to