http://people.apache.org/~coar/mlists.html#wicket.apache.org
Maarten On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Frank Silbermann < frank.silberm...@fedex.com> wrote: > Chris Colman <chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com> Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:41 > PM: > >> > >> The 'popularity' test is very vague but I understand it's purpose, > >> they want to ensure that they use products that are widely used > >> and have an active user community: which is very true of Wicket. > >> Does anyone have some numbers on this? Like how many Wicket > developers > >> there are, or how many websites are Wicket driven? ... > > Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:53 > PM: > > There's no way to quantify this metric. ... There is a page on > > the wiki that lists a fraction of the sites using Wicket. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/websites-based-on-wicket.html > > That page would help, but a mere fraction of the sites might give the > wrong idea. > > Jeremy: > > Ultimately, I would direct them away from this. It doesn't *actually* > > matter. What matters is this (in roughly this order): > > > > 1. Pick a technology that fits your needs > > 2. Pick a technology that is productive > > 3. Pick a technology that, when you hit a stumbling block, you can > get > > help with. > > > > You've already demonstrated one and two. > > Not really. He has yet to demonstrated that Wicket meets their > popularity needs. In lieu of having them subscribe to the message list, > maybe he can direct them to the archived messages on Nabble. > > Is there a way a program could extract a count of the participants (i.e. > distinct e-mail addresses) in the archived mailing list for a variety of > time periods (to show growth in user base)? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
