why would you write your own when one is already there? -igor
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:37 PM, James Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 16, 2011 11:49 AM, "Igor Vaynberg" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:49 AM, James Carman >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > The only thing "external" is the conversation management stuff from >> > Seam, it looks like. The user would have to make sure they include >> > the container-specific "adapter" code on the classpath >> > (org.jboss.seam.conversation:seam-conversation-weld for example) for >> > their CDI container. >> >> yes. this will go away once cdi 1.1 is release which provides the >> conversation scope api >> > > This will be great! Do they have an eta? For now I'll write my own > abstraction similar to your CdiContainer > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
