On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>wrote:
> Hi, > > Isn't that very slow ? > Rhino is not the fastest script engine. > I didn't compare rhino to the likes of node.js, rubyracer etc when I started trying it out. My decision was based on use case and the fact that it is Java based. I also read the Pankaj Kumar blog on Beanshell, Rhino and Java -- Performance Comparison at the onset. His conclusion was fair enough for me even though that blog is kind of old. I'm still exploring though. When I have performance issues, I will benchmark rhino with similar technologies. Right now, I feel comfortable. > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Kayode Odeyemi <drey...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have lots of RingoJS modules that can be accessed via a url in a > browser. > > I have decided to use RingoJS for building simple modules that I will > like > > to include in wicket application as Page web parts - especially for > > features I need to be completely written in Javascript. > > > > If there's anyone using the same application design, I'll like to know > how > > you implemented the integration in wicket. I'm using wicket Include > > component which works very well. If there is any popular pattern that is > > generally adopted, I'll love to know about it. > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > Odeyemi 'Kayode O. > > http://ng.linkedin.com/in/kayodeodeyemi. t: @charyorde > > > > -- > Martin Grigorov > jWeekend > Training, Consulting, Development > http://jWeekend.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > -- Odeyemi 'Kayode O. http://ng.linkedin.com/in/kayodeodeyemi. t: @charyorde
