Hi, You can use, tbody as a replacement for wicket:container
Best regards, Sebastien On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Steve <shadders....@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm wondering if there's a better solution to the way I've been solving > a particular problem. When using listviews within a table I quite often > do something like this: > > <table> > <wicket:container wicket:id="list"> > <tr> > <td>row 1</td> > </tr> > > <tr> > <td>row 2</td> > </tr> > </wicket:container> > </table> > > The reason I don't attach the listview directly to the <tr> tag is > because I need multiple rows per list item. This works just fine except > where you want to use a listitem as an ajax target. If you use > setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true) on the wicket container wicket > throws a very annoying warning in developer mode which (quite rightly) > points out that wicket:container shouldn't be rendered. Using a <div> > or a <span> as the placeholder produces invalid html and browsers often > don't render it properly. wicket:container is probably also invalid but > at least produces the results you'd expect from the table in the browser. > > Is there a better way to do this? It would be nice if HTML had it's own > NOOP tag that does nothing and can be validly placed anywhere for > containing a block of elements. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
