Interesting! Thank you Andrea! fre 18 nov. 2016 kl. 12:41 skrev Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>:
> Hi, > > I haven't directly tried this approach but there is an Apache project, > Syncope, that recently has gone in this direction. The following is the > link to their enduser module which is built with Angular for the > frontend and uses Wicket resources for the REST API: > > https://github.com/apache/syncope/tree/master/client/enduser > > On 16/11/2016 12:56, Lars Törner wrote: > > Ok, thanks Martin! > > > > It would be really interesting to hear the opinion of someone that tried > > the approach. > > > > 2016-11-16 12:43 GMT+01:00 Martin Grigorov <martin.grigo...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Hi Lars, > >> > >> AFAIK some people use this approach in their applications. > >> > >> You can use Wicket resources as endpoints or any other, e.g. Spring MVC, > >> just make sure you "wrap" them in WicketSessionFilter so you have > access to > >> Application.get() and Session.get() inside them. > >> > >> On Nov 16, 2016 7:41 AM, "Lars Törner" <lars.tor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Ok, now I found wicketstuff-rest-annotations... so, can I create a > >> wicket > >>> page, load resources for a java scriptframework and then use > >>> wicket-rest-requests with ajax to integrate a SPA in my > >>> wicket-web-application? > >>> > >>> tisdag 15 november 2016 skrev Lars Törner <lars.tor...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> we're developing a webbapplication to our legacy product and we're > >> doing > >>>> it in wicket. > >>>> > >>>> We have a few pages which are using a lot of ajax, and therefore each > >> one > >>>> of them could be seen as kind of a SPA. (Does that make sense?) > >>>> > >>>> Now we might have a case when a client (or we our selves) would like > to > >>>> extend the wicket webbapplication with a page/spa written in > javascript > >>>> (angular/react etc). From the users point of view, there should be no > >>>> difference. It should be the same session etc. > >>>> > >>>> Can this be done with a dynamic resource? Or in some other way? Is it > a > >>>> bad idea or just another way to do things? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers > >>>> Lars > >>>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
