You can also take a look at https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master/wicketstuff-restannotations-parent It provides an implementation of JAX-RS based on Wicket IResource
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 9:29 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <[email protected]> wrote: > Ilia, > > Ok. Them "mounting" JERSEY as a wicket "resource" might be a solution? > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 7:22 AM Илья Нарыжный <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ernesto, > > > > WicketSessionFilter is cool workaround for most of cases, but in our case > > we need deeper integration. For example to have the same security model > for > > wicket pages and rests. > > Apparently, Jersey is not complex to integrate with. I already have more > or > > less working implementation of working Jersey under Wicket. > > > > Thanks, > > Ilia > > > > --------------------------------------------- > > Orienteer(http://orienteer.org) - open source Business Application > > Platform > > > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 10:16 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Ilia, > > > > > > If WicketSessionFilter not enough for your needs? It is a filter you > can > > > put in front of JERSEY and you will have some wicket related things. > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 6:50 PM Илья Нарыжный <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I know that story of wicket and different jax-rs containers is pretty > > > long. > > > > Currently we are using Jersey as a servlet under wicket filter, but > we > > > > don't like that in this case REST end-points have nothing about > Wicket: > > > no > > > > wicket session available, no wicket request cycle listeners executed > > and > > > > etc. > > > > There is an idea to implement IRequestHandler which will handle as > > Jersey > > > > Container. So it will be executed under wicket umbrella. > > > > > > > > Questions: > > > > 1) What do you think about this? > > > > 2) Is there some existing implementation of what I'm talking about? > > > > > > > > Please reply also even in a case if you interested in this library. > It > > > will > > > > help me to understand: does it worst to make this integration as a > > > separate > > > > library or we can embed into our code within Orienteer. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ilia > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------- > > > > Orienteer(http://orienteer.org) - open source Business Application > > > > Platform > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > > > > > > > > -- > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro >
