On 8 December 2010 20:16, Paul Harris <harris...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 7 December 2010 21:34, Paul Harris <harris...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 11 November 2010 22:51, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Nov 11, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Florin Ciubotaru wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> >>> >> On Nov 11, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Florin Ciubotaru wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Hi Marius, >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea < >>> >>> mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Florin, I suspect you have to update the XHTML that XWord generates >>> when >>> >>>> the user inserts an image to match the rendering module >>> expectations. >>> >>>> See http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5554 . Starting with XE >>> 2.5 >>> >>>> image and link markers (the XHTML comments used by the rendering >>> module) >>> >>>> use the same syntax. Let me know if you need any help. >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Indeed, this could be the cause of the issue. I would have expected >>> this >>> >>> behavior to be backwords compatible or having the old one deprecated >>> for >>> >>> several XWiki versions as we receive this 'formated' XHTML trough >>> public >>> >>> APIs. At this point the conversion will simply crash when used by an >>> >> older >>> >>> client. >>> >> >>> >> IMO we should check the version of XE when XWord connects to it and if >>> it's >>> >> not compatible mention it. >>> >> >>> > >>> >> WDYT? >>> >> >>> > XOffice already checks the XE version for several reasons. For this >>> > particular issue, I'd prefer to implement the fix it rather then saying >>> it's >>> > incompatible. First thing to do until a release is done, is to at least >>> > document this on the wiki. >>> > The client relies on the XML-RPC and REST APIs which means that it >>> should be >>> > compatible with the server as long as nothing changes in the API specs. >>> > I cannot confirm the exact cause of the issue yet. But based on the >>> hint >>> > from Marius I could say that the xhtml parser should have accepted the >>> old >>> > image marker for several versions. XML-RPC is a backwards compatible >>> API, >>> > once we introduced the conversion methods, it means we commit to having >>> them >>> > working properly across several XWiki versions. >>> >>> On the server side, in the rendering module, we have *voluntarily* broken >>> several APIs. See the release notes for 2.5: >>> >>> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ReleaseNotesXWikiEnterprise25#HAPIBreakages >>> >>> I don't know how this can affect you (i.e how this can affect the XMLRPC >>> module). >>> >>> But if you produce XHTML on the XOffice side and if this XHTML contains >>> markers then the marker syntax has changed in 2.5. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >>> >>> >> >> I'd like to get XWord working, even if it means hacking it myself. >> Can anyone give me some pointers on what has to be done? >> >> thanks >> Paul >> >> > > Hi again, > > I've downloaded the xoffice svn and am trying to build it with MS VC 2010, > but it says the .pfx files are password protected. I tried to Install the > PFX files, and its asking for a password. > > Whats the password? > or, if you can't give that out, how can i create my own pfx files so I can > build it? > > Never mind, I managed to create my own pfx _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
