On 7 December 2010 21:34, Paul Harris <harris...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11 November 2010 22:51, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 11, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Florin Ciubotaru wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On Nov 11, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Florin Ciubotaru wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Marius, >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea < >> >>> mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Florin, I suspect you have to update the XHTML that XWord generates >> when >> >>>> the user inserts an image to match the rendering module expectations. >> >>>> See http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5554 . Starting with XE >> 2.5 >> >>>> image and link markers (the XHTML comments used by the rendering >> module) >> >>>> use the same syntax. Let me know if you need any help. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> Indeed, this could be the cause of the issue. I would have expected >> this >> >>> behavior to be backwords compatible or having the old one deprecated >> for >> >>> several XWiki versions as we receive this 'formated' XHTML trough >> public >> >>> APIs. At this point the conversion will simply crash when used by an >> >> older >> >>> client. >> >> >> >> IMO we should check the version of XE when XWord connects to it and if >> it's >> >> not compatible mention it. >> >> >> > >> >> WDYT? >> >> >> > XOffice already checks the XE version for several reasons. For this >> > particular issue, I'd prefer to implement the fix it rather then saying >> it's >> > incompatible. First thing to do until a release is done, is to at least >> > document this on the wiki. >> > The client relies on the XML-RPC and REST APIs which means that it >> should be >> > compatible with the server as long as nothing changes in the API specs. >> > I cannot confirm the exact cause of the issue yet. But based on the hint >> > from Marius I could say that the xhtml parser should have accepted the >> old >> > image marker for several versions. XML-RPC is a backwards compatible >> API, >> > once we introduced the conversion methods, it means we commit to having >> them >> > working properly across several XWiki versions. >> >> On the server side, in the rendering module, we have *voluntarily* broken >> several APIs. See the release notes for 2.5: >> >> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ReleaseNotesXWikiEnterprise25#HAPIBreakages >> >> I don't know how this can affect you (i.e how this can affect the XMLRPC >> module). >> >> But if you produce XHTML on the XOffice side and if this XHTML contains >> markers then the marker syntax has changed in 2.5. >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >> > > I'd like to get XWord working, even if it means hacking it myself. > Can anyone give me some pointers on what has to be done? > > thanks > Paul > >
Hi again, I've downloaded the xoffice svn and am trying to build it with MS VC 2010, but it says the .pfx files are password protected. I tried to Install the PFX files, and its asking for a password. Whats the password? or, if you can't give that out, how can i create my own pfx files so I can build it? thanks Paul _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
