2014-02-26 12:13 GMT+01:00 vinc...@massol.net <vinc...@massol.net>: > > > > > On 25 Feb 2014 at 18:58:00, 114 (ad...@114hareketi.org(mailto: > ad...@114hareketi.org)) wrote: > > > It's a good idea to include such information in an ID but lack of > sequential > > primary key for each page on the database is a design weakness I think. > > I agree that offering a permalink for pages is important but this may not > need a sequential id in DB. >
As pages have versions, you could use any invariant from very first version of page to build a unique ID I suppose (like, hash of content). Question also is, would you want to have just permalink of a page (ie, last version), and/or permalinks on a specific version of a page. > > > Will it be included on version 6.0? I hope so. > > In 6.0 I highly doubt it since I don't know anyone working on this. Unless > you provide a nice Pull Request for this! :) > > For 6.x, maybe we'll be able to implement the "follow rename" feature. > However, changing the DB structure has not been discussed and is not > planned so far. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > [snip] > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
