Hi Vincent,
Thanks for creating a new thread, since that`s what I should have done
myself.
I approached this as a discussion about what is the good/sensible default
that better fits 80-90% of the user's needs, as opposed to not having this
default and the user ending up with "Main" (or whetever else) everywhere
(i.e. cons of not doing Use Case 1).
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:39 AM, vinc...@massol.net <vinc...@massol.net>
wrote:
> Hi Edy and all,
>
> On 5 Jan 2016 at 11:52:24, Eduard Moraru (enygma2...@gmail.com(mailto:
> enygma2...@gmail.com)) wrote:
>
> > Hi Randy,
> >
> > From your choice of words (and your continued usage of the now deprecated
> > "spaces" macro on the homepage, as observed in the screenshot you`ve
> > provided), I understand that you still see things in terms of "creating
> > spaces" and "creating documents inside spaces" in 7.4 and, IMO, that`s
> > really the issue.
> >
> > In case you`ve missed it from the release notes, starting with 7.2, we`ve
> > introduced the notion of Nested Pages [1], which means that you no longer
> > have the notion of "pages inside spaces", but always "pages inside
> pages".
> > Technically, it is actually implemented by always creating a "space" when
> > you create a page from the UI, but the user should see it as if he is
> > always creating a page.
> >
> > = Use Case 1 =
> >
> > When your users go to your homepage and create a new page "under the Main
> > space", they are actually creating a nested page (old "space"), under the
> > homepage (document called "Main") of your wiki. If you change [2] the
> > homepage of your wiki to point to a different document instead (say
> > "Some.Other.Homepage"), I`m fairly sure that you do not want your users
> to
> > start creating new pages as children of that page (e.g.
> > "Some.Other.Homepage.NewUserPage"), because that is what the alternative
> > would lead to.
> >
> > The logic behind the original decision of handling the homepage
> differently
> > was that, even as Guillaume was hinting, the homepage is seen as the
> "root"
> > of your wiki. Creating a page from the root should result in creating top
> > level pages, not child pages. If you wanted to create a child page of
> > something from the homepage, you would explicitly do so by selecting a
> > parent. Not selecting a parent while on the homepage would logically
> imply
> > that you want to create a page in the wiki (i.e. top page).
> >
> > I`m curious why do you find it normal the other way around, i.e. landing
> on
> > the wiki (i.e. not navigating somewhere in particular) + creating a new
> > page => resulting in creating a child page of the "Main" page (which
> > happens to be the homepage).
> >
> > If you always create child pages of the homepage ("Main" page), on the
> long
> > run, all your URLs will be /Main/This/Page, /Main/That/Page,
> > /Main/That/Other/Page, etc... but ultimately, what is this "Main", and
> why
> > is it that important to drag it along in all your page URLs? (of course,
> > again, if you change your homepage to "Some.Other.Homepage", all your
> urls
> > will be prefixed by that!)
> >
> > = Use case 2 =
> >
> > Now, another way of looking at this would be that, for some reason, you
> > *really* want to keep all your content under some top level page (e.g. as
> > Vincent suggested, a "Content" container page), perhaps to separate it
> from
> > applications (which, for historic reasons, currently are also located in
> > the top level) like Blog, Sandbox, etc. or any other reason.
> >
> > The only limitation in this usecase is if you also want to use that
> > container page ("Main", "Content", etc.) as your homepage. In this case,
> > indeed, I see no other solution but to modify the createinline.vm
> template
> > or for us to drop this behavior altogether.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Conclusion so far:
> > We have 2 use cases regarding a new page's parent. They can both coexist,
> > except that, in some cases, the 2nd use case is limited by the first use
> > case. If we consider this limitation to be a deal breaker, then we are
> left
> > with 2 choices:
> > A. Drop use case 1 (i.e. always propose the current page as parent of the
> > new page, regardless if the current page is the homepage or not)
> > B. Make use case 1 configurable (i.e. enable or disable it completely, in
> > case you are suffering from the limitation of the second use case; this
> > allows the user to decide if it's useful or not)
> >
> > Of course, if option B is what we go for, we also need to figure out
> where
> > we would put such a configuration.
> >
> > I would be in favor of option B (since I obviously believe that use case
> 1
> > is something useful for the majority of cases), but have no idea on the
> > location of the configuration.
> >
> > WDYT?
>
> I agree about what you’ve said above. However I think the main problem
> comes from the fact that the user doesn’t know:
> * That he’s on a special page (home page). He sees himself/herself on the
> Main/WebHome page, i.e. in the Main space.
>
Why would the user care at this point?
Are you talking about the case when a user actually wants to create a new
sub-page under the Main page? In this case we would have a 3rd Use Case
that I have not covered in my previous mail, which, indeed, would be
affected by Use Case 1.
* The user doesn’t realize that the home page of his/her wiki is a virtual
> page that can be configured to point to any page and that it just happens
> that by default it’s been set to point to Main.WebHome.
> * It can even be argued that the home page doesn’t exist and that the user
> is redirected to the page configured in the main wiki’s descriptor, i.e.
> Main.WebHome and thus when you click “+” to add a new page you’re not on
> the home page anywhere but on Main.WebHome.
>
> So, I see 2 choices:
>
> 1) Option A, i.e. "drop use case 1 (i.e. always propose the current page
> as parent of the new page, regardless if the current page is the homepage
> or not)."
>
> 2) Find a way to make the home page special and different from
> Main.WebHome. It could be a special URL as suggested by Guillaume in a
> previous post, such as http://localhost:8080/xwiki/bin/view/ and it would
> redirect to a special resource type for the home page, which would be
> served as a template. For example: http://localhost:8080/xwiki/home. This
> would be easy to implement. Of course we would keep the ability to
> configure where the home page of the main wiki points to in the Admin UI
> and /home would be used only when no custom configuration is defined so
> that it would still be easy for users to configure what they want to
> display on the home page. In order to make it simpler we could even
> introduce a "Home Page” entry in the Admin UI. We would also need to find
> some different content for Main.WebHome.
>
I find this solution a bit too complicated on first sight and it might
cause more problems than it fixes.
On the plus side, it would maybe help differentiating where the user comes
*from*. For example, if the user is on /xwiki/home, then he's on the
homepage and we can apply UseCase1, but if the user is on
/xwiki/bin/view/Main/, then he is just browsing to a page and there we
can/should not apply UseCase1 since if he wants to create a new page there,
he most likely wants the current page as parent. This advantage would help
in Use Case 3, identified above.
Configuring and getting the homepage programatically would still be done as
before, so overall, this would just be a resource/action/template that is
linked to from the logo, nothing more.
However, the question still remains for the limitation on Use Case 2, if
the admin wants to funnel new pages under a certain parent page (which is
the same as the homepage), so we still need a configuration (a.k.a. Option
B) to be able to support that as well.
>
> I haven’t thought about all the consequences of 2) but at first sight it
> seems it could be something that could work and could even solve the issue
> we currently have of it being hard to edit. Note that the home page
> wouldn’t have an Edit button. Seen differently, the home page would be
> controllable only by an Admin, which IMO can make sense.
>
> So, all in all, I think I’d be in favor of solution 2) (unless some
> gotchas). Barring that, I’d prefer solution 1) instead of option B above.
>
I might also be inclined towards solution 2) because it solves Use Case 3 +
has the ability to control the UI (remove the edit button). I`m not a fan
of the complexity of this solution though and the questions it could rise
on the long run... "What is this home, is it a resource? Can I use it
programatically? etc..."
My main objective was to remove the "Main" aspect out of XWiki`s URLs since
it`s something we no longer technically/actually/really need (compared to
the pre-ND XWiki versions, where the space part was *technically*
mandatory, so we came up with "Main").
Any other thoughts?
Thanks,
Eduard
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> > Thanks for all your feedback so far and I`m counting on your help and
> > anyone else interested to reach a conclusion regarding this.
> >
> > -Eduard
> >
> > ----------
> > [1]
> http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Features/ContentOrganization
> > [2]
> >
> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/FAQ/How+to+change+the+home+page+destination
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Randy Havens <
> > randy.hav...@cityofrochester.gov> wrote:
> >
> > > > So if we bring
> > > > back the old behavior as-is we'd still have to find a solution for
> > > > top-level space creation.
> > >
> > > That’s already taken care of. This is how I always created spaces
> before:
> > > (this is a screenshot from my 7.4 instance, so I know that it is still
> an
> > > option)
> > >
> > > [cid:image001.png@01D146C6.3625A240]
> > > > A suggestion I had now that nested spaces are activated by default
> was to
> > > > make the home page of the wiki be "above" every other space. Said
> > > > differently, the home page would reside directly at
> > > > https:///xwiki/bin/view/
> > > > without anything else being mentioned. From that page you'd be able
> to
> > > > create top-level spaces, and every other page would behave as
> expected,
> > > > including Main.WebHome. I think this is what would feel the most
> natural,
> > > > but it causes many underlying issues, notably because a page with no
> > > > document reference cannot really exist in XWiki right now.
> > >
> > > I agree. This seems to be a sensible solution.
> > >
> > >
> > > image001.png (23K) <
> > > http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/attachment/7597376/0/image001.png>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
