So I will write a local interpreter for now. I want to use Zeppelin as an UI of an app, but I do not want to put an app into Zeppelin sources, a remote interpreter would be very handy here.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 2:30 AM Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think connecting to remote interpreter is broken in 0.9, because we > introduce bi-directional communication channel in 0.9. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2035 > > > Artur Rataj <arturra...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月5日周二 上午12:42写道： > >> Please, give me some hints... >> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 5:39 PM Artur Rataj <arturra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > To sum this up, >> > >> https://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.7.0/manual/interpreters.html#connecting-to-the-existing-remote-interpreter >> > says >> > >> > RemoteInterpreterServer interpreter=new RemoteInterpreterServer(3678); >> > // Here, 3678 is the port on which interpreter will listen. >> > >> > This constructor, however, does not exist any more. What exists is: >> > >> > public RemoteInterpreterServer(String intpEventServerHost, >> > int intpEventServerPort, >> > String portRange, >> > String interpreterGroupId, >> > boolean isTest) >> > which requires intpEventServerHost!=null && isTest=false for >> > createInterpreter() to work. This in turn attempts to connect to >> > intpEventServerHost:intpEventServerPort. The latter looks like >> > "interpreter event server host". Possibly it is about the web server, >> > so I put localhost:8080 there. >> > >> > So possibly, now it is the interpreter which connects to Zeppelin, and >> > not the opposite? But then why "connect to remote process" still >> > requires a port? I need to specify the port somewhere. Be it, >> > "portRange" has something in common? Not, putting a port there makes >> > IndexOutOfBoundException elsewhere. So port:port possibly if it is >> > called a range? This time, createInterpreter works, but even after >> > interpreter restart, Zeppelin shows "Interpreter process is not >> > running: null". >> > >> > I appreciate your effort, I know that Zeppelin has in general good >> > docs, and that it is just an experimental snapshot, but I give up. It >> > is about a *remote* interpreter anyway, and I do not want to become a >> > Zeppelin insider because of it, would read some rudimentary docs >> > instead. >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:52 PM Artur Rataj <arturra...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > So I attempted to write a rudimentary remote interpreter anyway, >> > > despite that isTest needs to be true for the remote server constructor >> > > to work. The effect is, the server's method createInterpreter throws >> > > NullPointerException, as it calls intpEventClient, which in turn is >> > > initialised only if isTest is false. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:06 PM Artur Rataj <arturra...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Yes, I can do that, but I would want to connect to my interpreter >> via >> > > > any Zeppelin instance, not only via one customised, with an >> additional >> > > > interpreter added to its sources at compile time. This is why I >> wanted >> > > > to use a remote interpreter, i.e. one in an independent application. >> > > > >> > > > This constructor: >> > > > >> > > > RemoteInterpreterServer interpreter=new >> > > > RemoteInterpreterServer("localhost", >> > > > >> RemoteInterpreterUtils.findRandomAvailablePortOnAllLocalInterfaces(), >> > > > ":", "groupId", true); >> > > > >> > > > works only with isTest=true, which I guess is for ... testing only. >> > > > But I do not know, there are no docs. >> > > > >> > > > If the remote interpreter does not work, I will modify some simple >> > > > interpreter to support a remote interpreter. I guess that it would >> > > > work, but it seems somewhat nonsensical to implement a functionality >> > > > which in theory is already provided by Zeppelin. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:55 PM Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > The most simplest interpreter might be shell interpreter. You can >> create a simple interpreter module like sh module, and extend abstract >> class Interpreter. >> > > > > >> > > > > Refer >> > > > > >> http://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.8.2/development/writing_zeppelin_interpreter.html#make-your-own-interpreter >> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/shell/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/shell/ShellInterpreter.java >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Artur Rataj <arturra...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月4日周一 下午10:44写道： >> > > > >> >> > > > >> I would need any way of writing a remote interpreter for >> Zeppelin 0.9. >> > > > >> It would be useful to have some docs, an example or whatever >> which >> > > > >> describes RemoteInterpreterServer in 0.9. No API docs in the >> sources, >> > > > >> searching in turn for an actual usage of RemoteInterpreterServer >> on >> > > > >> the web shows some no-more-working test in 0.9. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> If I connect via Zeppelin to (new RemoteInterpreterServer(null, >> > > > >> SOME_PORT, "some-name", null)).start() and connect via add >> > > > >> interpterer/connect to existing process on the Zeppelin side, I >> get it >> > > > >> causes java.lang.RuntimeException: >> > > > >> org.apache.thrift.TApplicationException: Internal error >> processing >> > > > >> createInterpreter. If I replace null with any name like >> localhost, i >> > > > >> get "connection refused" on the interpreter side. By the way, >> checking >> > > > >> "connect to existing process" still makes it mandatory to specify >> > > > >> "interpreter group". >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Could you give me some basic hints on making a connection to a >> simple >> > > > >> remote interpreter which consumes paragraph contents and produces >> > > > >> %html? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Best Regards >> > > > > >> > > > > Jeff Zhang >> > > > -- > Best Regards > > Jeff Zhang >
