+1 for the optimization of the UI with the update after action. we have
some remote users over a laggy entreprise network...

2016-04-16 7:14 GMT+02:00 moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org>:

> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for sharing your feedback.
> Could you share how big your 4 notes are?
>
> Laggy response might comes from two different reasons.
>
> First one is size of notebook. Zeppelin front-end built-on AngularJS 1.x.
> And performance of front-end depends on number of watcher. While more
> paragraph creates more watcher, large size of notebook may cause laggy
> response. In this case, we can try optimize the front-end [1]
>
>
> Second one is network delay between your browser and ZeppelinServer
> daemon. Most of action you made inside notebook (run, hide/show output,
> change graph, etc) is send to ZeppelinServer, and ZeppelinServer broadcast
> response back to all connected browsers. Your browser is not updated when
> you make an action, but updated when browser got broadcast response from
> ZeppelinServer.
> For this reason, with large network delay between the browser and
> ZeppelinServer, user will experience some laggy action.
> This case, we can improve front-end, immediately update ui after action,
> before getting broadcast response.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Thanks,
> moon
>
> [1]
> https://www.google.com/search?q=angularjs+performance+optimization&oq=angularjs+performance+optimization&aqs=chrome..69i57.378j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:21 PM John Omernik <j...@omernik.com> wrote:
>
>> As I am getting back into the swing of things with Zeppelin, I am liking
>> it more and more! Great work community!
>>
>> One thing I have noticed is with as few as 4 notes, I can start getting
>> some laggy response from my browser (Firefox).   Since I am new, I am going
>> to assume it's something in my configuration, but in general, if my browser
>> is laggy, are there any good documents on which settings to tweak, how to
>> address these issues etc?  If there are any good tips, or documents, I
>> would be very appreciative.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to