Michael-O wrote:
> I suppose *no one* on this list will agree you.
>
> We do *not* need a new meter nor a nautical kilometer.
>
> what we need is the a quick transition to gon: 2pi = 400 gon (*no*
> min or s anymore)
> for convenience you can use then centigon, milligon or microgon
>
> the nautical mile would be dead, finally.
>
> later, if possible replace clock by 24x100x100
>
> 1 h = 100 min = 100 x 100 s
>
> this system would be feasible for *all* and every application the
> result will be that we have to redefine some units on a new base but
> this would ne be a tremendous problem.
>
> earth's girth remains 40 000 km!!!
>
> Brij Bhushan Vij wrote:
>> Michael, sir:
>>> .....has someone a good and reasonable approach on?
>> I have been projecting THIS view BUT without saying that 1-degree
>> x100' x100" be *called New 'gon' and '1/100th as New centigon'.
>> Yes, DECIMALISATION of Time of the HOUR when merged with decimalised
>> Arc-angle (of 360-degree) are watched closely - the New 'gon' is
>> 1/360th of the Earth circumference; AND 1/100th of New "gon" or *New
>> centigon* is the reflection of ONE Nautical Kilomere New (km'). This
>> make the New 'gon'
>> 1.11194886884 times of the *gon* projected during the French
>> experience of 'change to metric units'. The Earth circumference shall
>> then be 36000 km' (or New gon).
>> My suggestion to  define Metre New (m') as: 1/10^5th of the degree
>> (or New gon); and is the distance traversed by light, in vacuum,
>> during the time interval 1/97059575.22th of the decimal second (sd) -
>> at presently accepted value for light velocity; is for BIPM/CCU to
>> give consideration.
>> My regards,
>> Brij Bhushan Vij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> 20040118/05:70(decimal) AM(IST)
>> Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda.
>>       *****The New Calendar Rhyme*****
>> Thirty days in July, September:
>> April, June, November, December;
>> All the rest have thirty-one; accepting February alone:
>> Which hath but twenty-nine, to be (in) fine;
>> Till leap year gives the whole week READY:
>> Is it not time to MODIFY or change to make it perennial, Oh Daddy!
>>
>> And make the calendar work with Leap Week Rule!
>> *****     *****     *****     *****
>>
>>> From: "Michael Ossipov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Subject: [USMA:28319] Introduction of the gon
>>> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 19:34:12 +0100
>>>
>>> Hello Gentlemen,
>>>
>>> a few days or weeks ago, I was think how we can efficiently replace
>>> degrees by gons.
>>>
>>> my first thought is quite common 360° -> 400 gon, no minutes or
>>> seconds, subdivisions only in conjuction with metric prefixes
>>> permitted. E.g. 10 centigon which should equal 10 kilometers.
>>>
>>> this is actually about navigation but how about other fields like
>>> math or even physics which really rely on degrees in areas like
>>> force on a inclined horizon or AC calculations with complex numbers
>>> and many other fields. those would actually change the number after
>>> the calculation.
>>>
>>> has someone a good and reasonable approach on?
>>>
>>> bye
>>>
>>> thx
>>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Free transactions in any ATM across India.
>> http://server1.msn.co.in/msnleads/suvidha/dec03.asp?type=hottag Click
>> here.

Reply via email to