1 h = 100 min = 100 x 100 sYES, can fulfill the dream of French Academy of Sciencves to produce a uniform 'measurement system for all nations'
this system would be feasible for *all* and every application the result will be that we have to redefine some units on a new base but this would ne be a tremendous problem.
I am afraid, this is like to cause the similar confusion as it was when the British and rest of the world *held themselves up* against Nautical Mile and NOT changing the face of clock to 10/20-hr day with 100 x100 sub-units or The Metric Second as I reported (1973 April) throught my published contribution by Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.> earth's girth remains 40 000 km!!!
Resistance no doubt might be there BUT positively NO FAILURE, to *easiest, surest & cheapest* transition when thought about!
Brij Bhushan Vij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
20040118/06:59(decimal) AM(IST)
Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda.
*****The New Calendar Rhyme*****
Thirty days in July, September:
April, June, November, December;
All the rest have thirty-one; accepting February alone:
Which hath but twenty-nine, to be (in) fine;
Till leap year gives the whole week READY:
Is it not time to MODIFY or change to make it perennial, Oh Daddy!
And make the calendar work with Leap Week Rule! ***** ***** ***** *****
From: "Michael-O" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [USMA:28322] Fw: Decimalised Degree RE:Introduction of the gon Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:27:39 +0100
Michael-O wrote: > I suppose *no one* on this list will agree you. > > We do *not* need a new meter nor a nautical kilometer. > > what we need is the a quick transition to gon: 2pi = 400 gon (*no* > min or s anymore) > for convenience you can use then centigon, milligon or microgon > > the nautical mile would be dead, finally. > > later, if possible replace clock by 24x100x100 > > 1 h = 100 min = 100 x 100 s > > this system would be feasible for *all* and every application the > result will be that we have to redefine some units on a new base but > this would ne be a tremendous problem. > > earth's girth remains 40 000 km!!! > > Brij Bhushan Vij wrote: >> Michael, sir: >>> .....has someone a good and reasonable approach on? >> I have been projecting THIS view BUT without saying that 1-degree >> x100' x100" be *called New 'gon' and '1/100th as New centigon'. >> Yes, DECIMALISATION of Time of the HOUR when merged with decimalised >> Arc-angle (of 360-degree) are watched closely - the New 'gon' is >> 1/360th of the Earth circumference; AND 1/100th of New "gon" or *New >> centigon* is the reflection of ONE Nautical Kilomere New (km'). This >> make the New 'gon' >> 1.11194886884 times of the *gon* projected during the French >> experience of 'change to metric units'. The Earth circumference shall >> then be 36000 km' (or New gon). >> My suggestion to define Metre New (m') as: 1/10^5th of the degree >> (or New gon); and is the distance traversed by light, in vacuum, >> during the time interval 1/97059575.22th of the decimal second (sd) - >> at presently accepted value for light velocity; is for BIPM/CCU to >> give consideration. >> My regards, >> Brij Bhushan Vij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> 20040118/05:70(decimal) AM(IST) >> Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda. >> *****The New Calendar Rhyme***** >> Thirty days in July, September: >> April, June, November, December; >> All the rest have thirty-one; accepting February alone: >> Which hath but twenty-nine, to be (in) fine; >> Till leap year gives the whole week READY: >> Is it not time to MODIFY or change to make it perennial, Oh Daddy! >> >> And make the calendar work with Leap Week Rule! >> ***** ***** ***** ***** >> >>> From: "Michael Ossipov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Subject: [USMA:28319] Introduction of the gon >>> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 19:34:12 +0100 >>> >>> Hello Gentlemen, >>> >>> a few days or weeks ago, I was think how we can efficiently replace >>> degrees by gons. >>> >>> my first thought is quite common 360° -> 400 gon, no minutes or >>> seconds, subdivisions only in conjuction with metric prefixes >>> permitted. E.g. 10 centigon which should equal 10 kilometers. >>> >>> this is actually about navigation but how about other fields like >>> math or even physics which really rely on degrees in areas like >>> force on a inclined horizon or AC calculations with complex numbers >>> and many other fields. those would actually change the number after >>> the calculation. >>> >>> has someone a good and reasonable approach on? >>> >>> bye >>> >>> thx >>> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Free transactions in any ATM across India. >> http://server1.msn.co.in/msnleads/suvidha/dec03.asp?type=hottag Click >> here.
_________________________________________________________________
Send DD, pay no commission. http://server1.msn.co.in/msnleads/suvidha/dec03.asp?type=hottag Click here.
