Sorry, Paul. I read my e-mails in reverse order. This is the one where you talk about the territories (which I assume includes Puerto Rico).
Thanks, Ezra -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Paul Trusten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > With the appropriate language (adjusted for name of state), I also sent > this message to Alabama W&M officials and Alabama Attorney General King. > New York and Alabama are the only states that have not yet adopted the > UPLR metric-only labeling option. If we can get unanimity among the > states on metric-only labeling, we can then declare that there is no > opposition to metric-only commerce in any U.S. jurisdiction. All > U.S.non-state territories have already adopted the measure. > > -- > Paul Trusten, R.Ph. > Public Relations Director > U.S. Metric Association, Inc. > www.metric.org > 3609 Caldera Blvd., Apt. 122 > Midland TX 79707-2872 USA > +1(432)528-7724 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://oleapothecary.blog.com > > > > Dear NYS A&M Officials, > > For this National Metric Week (October 7-13), I am writing to urge New York > State to adopt the metric-only labeling option of the National Conferences of > Weights and Measures' Uniform Packaging and Labeling Regulation (UPLR). > > If enacted in your state, the measure would grant permission for > non-federally-regulated products to be labeled in metric units only (that is, > without U.S. customary units). Only your state and Alabama have not yet > adopted > this measure. Adoption of this UPLR provision will establish no mandate and > thus will cause no increased costs to New York businesses. > > Sincerely, > > Paul Trusten, R.Ph. > Public Relations Director > U.S. Metric Association, Inc. > 3609 Caldera Blvd., Apt. 122 > Midlant TX 79707-2872 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
