Martin - when a Brit embarks on buying a new home - he, she or they go to an estate agent. The first thing they will be interested in - right at the beginning - is what the estate agent puts on the glossy brochures, leaflets and - most importantly at the beginning - the shop front window ad. The info shown is directly geared at what primarily interests someone embarking on buying a house - these details are very important to the would-be [new] home owner. Also - telling a Brit the square footage, or meterage, of a new home would mean very little to them. It's just how it is and what people are used to (others here have noted that this can even be different between states of the USA).Incidentally - you're not letting on whether HIPS are seen as a popular thing over here ;-)From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]: RE: [USMA:42127] RE: BBC web site keeps it metricDate: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 05:33:57 +0000
In the last few years it has become law for any house that is sold in the United Kingdom to have a HIP (Home Information Package). Amongst other things, the HIP includes a “Total Floor Area” in square metres. However it is not mandatory for estate agents to use the figures from the HIP when advertising, and most are loathe to do so – they want to give potential buyers sweet, but meaningless words. On the continent it is usual for an estate agent to advertise a house as being “Three bedrooms, 98 m²”. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Humphreys Sent: 03 December 2008 22:45 To: U.S. Metric Association Subject: [USMA:42127] RE: BBC web site keeps it metric Hence all houses advertised in the UK showing LxW (in feet, but sometimes metres in brackets after) - this despite no law (I believe) forcing them to do this. Sometimes the market - when left to itself - really does work well. ;-) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] Subject: [USMA:42124] RE: BBC web site keeps it metric Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:04:16 +0000 This shows what a mess imperial (or colonial) units are. Comparing square feet and fractions of an acre is a nightmare. However, comparing square metres and hectares is a doddle. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael J. Barnes Sent: 03 December 2008 17:51 To: U.S. Metric Association Subject: [USMA:42123] RE: BBC web site keeps it metric Stan, I must disagree about U.S. residential lot sizes being expressed in square feet, at least in my part of the country (New England). Site plans, municipal tax records, real estate listings, and colloquial references are almost exclusively expressed in acres (e.g. .25 acre, .34 acre, 1.00 acre or 1 acre, 1.50 acres, 2.18 acres, etc.). --Mike Barnes >>Residential lot sizes in the US are in square feet. Lot sizes are in acres for farms. It doesn't make sense to use such a large unit as acre or hectare in describing lot size when a more standard and common unit (m, km etc) is available. Stan Doore<< Get Windows Live Messenger on your Mobile. Click Here! _________________________________________________________________ Imagine a life without walls. See the possibilities. http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/122465943/direct/01/
