I dislike the DD-MM-YYYY and the MM-DD-YYYY formats equally for the reason
that the two can easily become confused.

 

I was brought up in South Africa.  For some insane reason we were taught to
write the date as day-month-year in English and month-day-year in Afrikaans.
(Both languages had equal standing in law).  This caused further problems
for things like post office rubber stamps - did they use the English date or
the Afrikaans date - eg "Dec" or "Des" for the last month of the year.  When
South Africa adopted the metric system, the Government decided to sort the
problem out for once and for all - the ISO 8601 format was used for all
Government purposes.  

 

  _____  

From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [mailto:owner-u...@colostate.edu] On Behalf
Of Stephen Mangum
Sent: 10 March 2009 18:38
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:43645] Re: 24 hour time

 

I prefer DD-MM-YYYY (and other formats in this order), but have found myself
writing YYYY-MM-DD as of late. The problem I have with the latter is the
difficulty in reading it. 4 July 1776 can be read "the fourth of July,
seventeen seventy six." How does one read 1776-07-04? Or is the discussion
about announcements and hours and not prose? What I like about the ISO
standard is the lack of confusion: I think most Americans will know what it
means, while they will read 04/07/1776 as "March seventh." 

Stephen Mangum

 

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Brian J White <br...@bjwhite.net> wrote:

There aren instances where that's handy.....but really, ISO standard is the
way to go, worldwide.
It's more hidden than anything else.   I usually see it on receipts and
schedules and such.  But not for "human" use per se.  Shame too, because it
works nicely worldwide.



At 11:08 2009-03-10, Stephen Humphreys wrote:



I like the "Oracle" (huge US software company) way of doing things:
'DD-MON-RR' or 'DD-MON-YYYY'
So today would be 10-MAR-09 or 10-MAR-2009 



  _____  

From: stan.do...@verizon.net
To: usma@colostate.edu
Subject: [USMA:43635] Re: 24 hour time
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:18:24 -0400

You are correct in fostering the use of the ISO date format; however, 
I prefer to use a dash (-) rather than a slash (/) as a separator in the
date format.  
For example 20009-03-10.  A dash makes it better readable.
    Stan Doore
 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: John Frewen-Lord <mailto:j...@frewston.plus.com>  

To: U.S. Metric Association <mailto:usma@colostate.edu>  

Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 5:49 AM

Subject: [USMA:43628] Re: 24 hour time

The best way for the US to change its date format is to go straight to the
ISO format of YYYY/MM/DD.  When Canada converted in the late '70s, this was
the official format at the time, and all Canadian Federal and Provincial
government documentation at the time had to follow this format.  

 

Regretfully, and primarily thanks to Mr Gates, this seems to have been
abandoned, due in no small part to Windows defaulting to the US-only format,
regardless of which country it is sold in.

 

This is not merely of academic interest.  I bank with HSBC, and have both UK
and Canadian bank accounts, including something called Global View, where I
can view on line (and switch money on line between) my accounts in both
countries simultaneously.  The UK accounts are shown in DD/MM/YY format.
The Canadian ones are shown in MM/DD/YY format when looking at statement
summaries or selecting a date range to view a statement - but the individual
entries in that statement are shown in DD/MM/YY format!  Needless to say
this is infuriating and confusing, and I wonder why HSBC do this, as they
are UK-based.  However, my printed Canadian statements are postmarked in NY
State with US postage, so there must be a US connection in there somewhere.

 

If anyone does online currency trading, all the trading platforms are in
YYYY/MM/DD format, and various online videos I receive from US-based gurus
and experts are also usually shown in this format.  This does save a lot of
confusion. 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: David <mailto:totakeke...@yahoo.com>  

To: U.S. Metric Association <mailto:usma@colostate.edu>  

Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:07 AM

Subject: [USMA:43625] 24 hour time

What are the changes of the United States adopting 24 hour time instead of
the AM/PM thing? Would there be some kind of law (which would probably occur
after metrication) or would it just be one of those things people just
adopt? What about date standards? I would like to see America start using
DD/MM/YY instead of MM/DD/YY. What does it take for a country to adopt a
date/time standard?

 

  _____  

Windows Live just got better. Find
<http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665375/direct/01/>  out more! 

 




-- 
Stephen

Reply via email to