"so a pint would be 578 mL"

 

Well we can't have that - because people would use it as an excuse for being 
drunk - "It was that extra 10 ml that did it, love, honest!"

 

:-)

 

 

 

 

 

 

P.S.  I did laugh at the 'new fangled' bit. And they say Americans don't do 
humour/irony like the Brits?  Pah!
 


Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 17:50:18 -0700
From: jmsteele9...@sbcglobal.net
Subject: [USMA:47058] RE: Saving the mile and the pint for Britain
To: usma@colostate.edu





I can do "snarky" as well as the next guy.
 
As to jockey weights, as reported to race fans, they are just descriptors, with 
no legal significance.  If there are legal limits (probably minimums or they 
need a weight belt) I would bet that they are in reality in kilograms.  I must 
admit, I have no clue how to Google to find out, however.
 
Since the pint is basically used for beer, you guys should dump this 
new-fangled Imperial gallon, and get back to your real roots, 1/8 of an ale 
gallon, nothing else will do.  Wikipedia seems to think it is 4.6212 L, so a 
pint would be 578 mL, and you guys are being cheated of 10 mL.  I don't know 
why you let your government change measures willy-nilly.  Get back to your 
roots. :)   (otherwise, you might as well go metric)





From: Stephen Humphreys <barkatf...@hotmail.com>
To: U.S. Metric Association <usma@colostate.edu>
Sent: Mon, April 5, 2010 6:06:08 PM
Subject: [USMA:47055] RE: Saving the mile and the pint for Britain



I don't usually expect a question like that from you JS!  ;-)  


We've forgotten the usage of stone/lb when they talk about jockey weights etc.


Personally I hate horse races/jumps - I tend to be compassionate about animals 
and how we treat them.



Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:24:19 -0700
From: jmsteele9...@sbcglobal.net
Subject: [USMA:47046] RE: Saving the mile and the pint for Britain
To: usma@colostate.edu





So the square foot and furlong are acceptable as descriptors but not legal 
trade measures.  Not quite "real" measures, are they?
 
Are the horse races "real" furlongs or 200 m furlongs?  (being just over 1 m 
different, can anyone really tell?)





From: Martin Vlietstra <vliets...@btinternet.com>
To: jmsteele9...@sbcglobal.net; U.S. Metric Association <usma@colostate.edu>
Sent: Mon, April 5, 2010 2:22:23 AM
Subject: RE: [USMA:47033] RE: Saving the mile and the pint for Britain





The troy ounce is legal for trading in precious metals.  Horse racing still 
uses furlongs to “describe” the course length.  For some weird reason it is 
legal to rent office area at £1000 for a 100 sq ft office, but it is not legal 
to rent a 100 sq ft office at £10 per sq ft.
 




From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [mailto:owner-u...@colostate.edu] On Behalf Of 
John M. Steele
Sent: 05 April 2010 02:36
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:47033] RE: Saving the mile and the pint for Britain
 


Just to quibble:

*The mile, yard, foot, and inch are used in road signage only.  Other length 
subdivisions, not used in road signage, have no legal standing, do they?  For 
example furlongs, chains, poles or rods, fathoms, links, hands, cables, 
leagues, etc.  Has not the UK conceded that the acre is no longer used in land 
registration.

 

*The pint can only be used to dispense draft beer, cider, or milk in returnable 
bottles, right,  All other uses are supplemental only, metric is required.

 

*The gallon, quart, gill, etc are not legal units, only supplemental? (also the 
bushel)

 

*The pound and ounce are not legal units, only supplemental?  (Is the troy 
ounce still a legal measure?)

 




From: Stephen Humphreys < barkatf...@hotmail.com >
To: U.S. Metric Association <usma@colostate.edu>
Sent: Sun, April 4, 2010 8:37:33 PM
Subject: [USMA:47032] RE: Saving the mile and the pint for Britain

Margaret Thatcher also brought in petrol price by the litre. 

 

But to the main point - the recent euro elections saw the tories send out 
pre-election pamphlets explaining how they 'saved the pound and the ounce for 
Britain '.

That makes them having 'saved' the mile and all the divisions thereof (yards, 
feet and inches - and hands if you include horses!)- plus lb, oz and pints,  
and gallons in mpg.  Amongst other things.

 

Actually -  I think the recent 'saving' was rather cheeky.  Apart from the fact 
that they only prevented the usage of lb/oz becoming illegal - it's highly 
dubious that 'they' did that either.



From: pat.naugh...@metricationmatters.com
To: usma@colostate.edu
Subject: [USMA:47029] Saving the mile and the pint for Britain
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:57:13 +1000

Dear All, 

 

I found this page at 
http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100402183300AAlPjkT and it 
reminded me of a media quote near the time when Margaret Thatcher left office. 
She is reported to have said in listing her achievements:

 

'We have saved the mile and the pint for Britain'.

 

Now that the mile and the pint are the last remaining legal Imperial measuring 
words in the UK their existence is often used to justify the use of all of the 
old paraphernalia of the old defunct and deprecated measuring words. Somehow 
the simple (legal) existence of the mile and the pint allows people to morally 
justify the use of acres, inches, ounces, pounds, tons, and so on interminably.

 

Margaret Thatcher might have been right in that the Tories 'saved the mile and 
the pint' in a legal sense, but in doing so they created a culture dedicated in 
large part to the dual expense of the hopeless muddle that measurement in the 
UK has become. With hindsight the damage that Margaret Thatcher has done to the 
education of children in the UK and to the economy is extraordinary. If we 
apply the Confederation of British Industry estimate of 9 % of turnover each 
year then the cost of simply saving two words is extraordinary.

 

It is interesting that the mile and the pint have been defined in terms of 
metric units since 1959 so the Margaret Thatcher versions of the words mile and 
pint are, in fact, metric units hidden behind Imperial words. Margaret Thatcher 
was Prime Minister of the UK from 1979 to 1990.

 









Cheers,

 

Pat Naughtin

Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, that you can obtain from 
http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html 

PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,

Geelong, Australia

Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

 

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each 
year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
in the USA . Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
NIST, and the metric associations of Canada , the UK , and the USA . See 
http://www.metricationmatters.com/ to subscribe.
 
 



Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now. 


Get a new e-mail account with Hotmail – Free. Sign-up now.                      
                  
_________________________________________________________________
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/
Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now

Reply via email to