I would venture to suggest that South Africa used the UK value.  A lot of
South African law (especially commercial law) was made up of taking the
equivalent British statue, replacing "The Queen" with "The State President"
and "London" with "Pretoria" and using that as a first draft. 

 

  _____  

From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [mailto:owner-u...@colostate.edu] On Behalf
Of John M. Steele
Sent: 11 November 2010 21:26
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:48850] Re: The United States does not use the metric system

 

My understanding is that Canada also attended.  They had traditionally used
and they proposed the compromise value selected, 25.4 mm/in (also 304.8
mm/ft, 914.4 mm/yd).  From NIST SP 447 I found the prior values used by the
US and UK, but I am not sure if Australia and SA had their own values or
used the UK value, as Commonwealth countries.

 

The 25.4 mm/in value very nearly split the difference between US and UK
values, was used in Canada, and was also recommended by some professional
societies.

 

  _____  

From: Martin Vlietstra <vliets...@btinternet.com>
To: U.S. Metric Association <usma@colostate.edu>
Cc: UKMA Metric Association <secret...@metric.org.uk>
Sent: Thu, November 11, 2010 3:52:11 PM
Subject: [USMA:48848] Re: The United States does not use the metric system

I understand that the conference in question was attended by the US , the UK
, Australia and South Africa .

 

  _____  

From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [mailto:owner-u...@colostate.edu] On Behalf
Of Pat Naughtin
Sent: 11 November 2010 06:15
To: U.S. Metric Association
Cc: UKMA Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:48837] Re: The United States does not use the metric system

 

On 2010/11/11, at 01:47 , John M. Steele wrote:

 

Pat is (nearly) correct.

 

Thanks John. You are right my "foot" error was of the "reverso-typo with
decimal point transition step" form, so the section should have read:

 

I have noticed that even while denying that the metric system exists, all of
the population of the USA routinely use:

* metric inches (defined as 25.4 mm exactly)

* metric feet (defined as 304.8 mm exactly)

* metric yards (defined as 914.4 mm exactly)

* metric miles (defined as 1609.344 metres exactly)

* metric pounds (defined as 453.592 37 grams exactly)

* metric short tons (defined as 907.184 74 kilograms exactly)

* metric long tons (defined as 1016.046 908 8 kilograms exactly)

 

For pound, short ton, and long ton, I used NIST resources but it now appears
that NIST is inconsistent with these numbers from web page to web page. This
time I used
http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/Publications/upload/AppC-10-HB44-Final
.pdf 

 

Oh how our minds we do pervert,

When first we practice to convert.

 

Could you direct me to a page where I can find the definitive conversion
factors for pound and tons.

 

You also wrote:

 

Because our foot, inch, etc differed slightly from the UK 's and other
English speaking nations, a conference was held in 1958 which lead to the
International foot officially adopted by the US , July 1, 1959, as 0.3048 m
exactly

 

Wasn't that the same meeting where a "gentlemen's" agreement was reached
that the spelling of "metre" would be "metre" in the USA if the UK agreed to
change the spelling of gramme to gram. The UK did its part of the deal. Go
to http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/Spelling_metre_or_meter.pdf and
search for "Chester H. Page".

 

I have just re-read most of the rather long document that I wrote at
http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/Spelling_metre_or_meter.pdf and I was
not kind to promoters of the meter spelling as a unit for length!

 

Cheers,

 

Pat Naughtin

Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, see
http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html

Hear Pat speak at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lshRAPvPZY 

PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,

Geelong, Australia

Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

 

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands
each year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat
provides services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and
professions for commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in
Asia, Europe, and in the USA . Pat's clients include the Australian
Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada , the
UK , and the USA . See http://www.metricationmatters.com/ to subscribe.

 

 

Reply via email to