Hi,

be also sure to plug the cable firmly on both
ends. I've seen it more than once with a cable
"half-plugged" and then it becomes usb2, not usb3.

My 2 cents.

Regards,
Cédric.

On 3/18/20 2:54 PM, Marcus Müller via USRP-users wrote:
> Hi Rodolphe,
> 
> first of all, check whether you're actually dealing with a USB3 port. I
> know, sounds strange, but if it's not blue and doesn't have more than
> four visible contacts, it's not standard-compliant USB3. The fact that
> it's attached to a xHCI doesn't itself mean it can do USB3.
> 
> Then, I can't quite remember whether the USB controller on the B200
> would even register as USB3 before the initial firmware is loaded. Try
> the following: In one terminal window, run `dmesg -Hwx`. Plug in the
> USRP, and see how it appears on the bus (it seems, as USB2 high-speed
> device). After that, in another terminal, you'd run `uhd_find_devices`,
> and see whether the device re-enumerates as USB3 SuperSpeed device.
> 
> Best regards,
> Marcus
> 
> On 18.03.20 13:43, Rodolphe Bertolini via USRP-users wrote:
>> Hello Ron, (I resend the email, I forgot to "reply to all")
>> Thank you for your quick feedback.
>>
>> Ok I understand. More information, lspci gives me :
>> 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH USB 3.1 xHCI
>> Host Controller (rev 10)
>> So I don't get why doesn't Ubuntu enables USB 3.0 with the B210.
>>
>> My problems looks like this one
>> http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/2018-July/057323.html
>>
>> The output of lsusb -t is similar, with "Driver=(none)"
>> A message of above mentioned thread suggests to enable 3.0 option in
>> BIOS, however I don't have such option. And even if I had, I didn't not
>> change anything between reboot / session switch so I really don't
>> understand where this regression is coming from.
>> Also I did the "solution" mentioned by the author :
>>
>> uhd_image_loader --args="type=b200,reset"
>>
>>
>> Which did not improve the situation.
>>
>>
>> Thank you again
>>
>> Rodolphe
>>
>> Le mer. 18 mars 2020 à 12:02, Ron Economos via USRP-users
>> <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>> a écrit :
>>
>>     dmesg should say "new SuperSpeed USB device number X using xhci_hcd"
>>     or "new SuperSpeed Gen 1 USB device number X using xhci_hcd" if you
>>     have a newer kernel.
>>
>>     "high-speed" means USB 2.0.
>>
>>     Ron
>>
>>     On 3/18/20 03:41, Rodolphe Bertolini via USRP-users wrote:
>>>     Dear all,
>>>
>>>     I have been using a USRP B210 on a laptop for months now. For
>>>     reasons, I switched to another Linux session, and using this
>>>     session UHD fails to talk to B210 over USB 3.0
>>>
>>>     dmesg tells me it is using the xhci_hcd driver (which I believe is
>>>     the driver for USB 3.0), and is also mentioning  "new high-speed
>>>     USB", which leads me to think that USB 3.0 link is well recognized
>>>     and active:
>>>
>>>     [  306.133028] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 16 using
>>>     xhci_hcd
>>>     [  306.260349] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=2500,
>>>     idProduct=0020
>>>     [  306.260351] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2,
>>>     SerialNumber=3
>>>     [  306.260352] usb 1-1: Product: USRP B200
>>>     [  306.260354] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: Ettus Research LLC
>>>     [  306.260355] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: 31B9289
>>>
>>>     However, when running any uhd command line, it fails using USB 3.0:
>>>
>>>     [INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 5.4.0 20160609; Boost_105800;
>>>     UHD_3.15.0.0-release
>>>     [INFO] [B200] Detected Device: B210
>>>     [INFO] [B200] Operating over USB 2.
>>>
>>>     I have also tried with UHD 3.14.1, no improvement.
>>>
>>>     I remember having a similar issue (maybe the same?) that had been
>>>     solved with something related to udev, but I sadly didn't take any
>>>     note of this.
>>>
>>>     Do you have any hint?
>>>
>>>     Thank you.
>>>     Regards,
>>>     Rodolphe
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     USRP-users mailing list
>>>     USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
>>>     http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     USRP-users mailing list
>>     USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
>>     http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
> 


_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to