On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 4:22 PM Jeffrey P Long <jpl...@mitre.org> wrote:
> I am going through the examples in > > > > Getting Started with RFNoC in UHD 4.0 - Ettus Knowledge Base > <https://kb.ettus.com/Getting_Started_with_RFNoC_in_UHD_4.0> > > > > And I thought maybe I had messed something up but I noticed in the example > the real block name is not there either > > > > | _____________________________________________________ > > | / > > | | RFNoC blocks on this device: > > ... > > | | * 0/Block#0 > > ... > > | _____________________________________________________ > > | / > > | | Static connections on this device: > > ... > > | | * 0/SEP#4:0==>0/Block#0:0 > > | | * 0/Block#0:0==>0/SEP#4:0 > > ... > > > > Is there a reason why this does not get reflected in the usrp probe? > > I am running it on a E320. I built my bit image using the OOT approach. > Moved it over and the .so created for my block. > > Do I need to bring over the block yml file or something? > Try setting the UHD_MODULE_PATH environment variable to the location of your .so file for your block and re-run the probe. Brian
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
