Looking through this rev, I only see three minor points brought up by
reviewers that don't appear (to me) to have been directly addressed:
- It was suggested that the document should updates RFC 5246 and RFC 6347.
- At the end of 7.5, it wasn't clear what "foregoing" referred to.
- It was suggested that an Informative/Normative references scrub take
place. (-prohibiting-rc4 was moved to Normative, but otherwise
everything else remained where it was.)
I'm comfortable putting this on the IESG agenda in its current form, and
can simply note these items in my ballot. If the editors or the shepherd
wish me to hold off, let me know in the next 24 hours.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
