>A way to report TLS failures is valuable. > >In addition to XML versa JSON, there are other reporting mechanisms like ARF >(see RFC 6650, for example) which seems applicable to this.
ARF is about messages, this is about connections. >I am quite concern about yet another reporting mechanism, which is different >from other 3 (maybe more) already defined mechanisms. This is the same reporting mechanism that DMARC uses. I can say from experience that reporting is one part of DMARC that works great. I have about 87,000 aggregate DMARC reports and 57,000 individual failure reports, summarized in a database from which I should try to extract something interesting someday. DMARC uses XML, these days it'd make more sense to use json but in doesn't make that much difference since there are parsing libararie for both. R's, John _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
