> On 11 May 2016, at 10:03, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, it is true that both DNSSEC and IPv6 still have some catching > up to do with vanilla DNS and IPv4, respectively. A sample of > DNSSEC adoption for a few TLDs: > > TLD DNSSEC > ---------- ----- > .bank 100.0% > .ovh 46.4% > .amsterdam 24.9% > .email 1.4% > .edu 1.4% > .net 0.61% > .com 0.44% > .xyz 0.29% > .berlin 0.13% > .nyc 0.0066%
Doesn't get more biased. nic.nl incentivises DNSSEC adoption with reduced domain rates (there're similar effort in Scandinavia as I am told by the PowerDNS people). I think DNSSEC is required for .bank and OVH just does their own thing. Aaron
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
