On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:25:52PM +0100, Daniel Margolis wrote:
> Right, so I think as Rolf and Viktor said, there are real concerns *on the
> MUA side* about the difficulty of an HTTP-only indicator of policy
> freshness.
>
> I think there are some reasonable points on both sides, and you (Alberto)
> definitely raise a good one about future extensibility versus our
> assumptions on infrequent policy updates. I don't claim to have the right
> answer, but in the interests of achieving a v1 I think we have been sort of
> weighting the feedback of MTA developers like Viktor fairly highly. ;)
FWIW, I totally understand and agree it is definitely the right thing to
do, even if MTA developers are unconvinced by my suggestions :)
Thanks very much for all your patience and thoughtful responses.
Alberto
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
