On 22/03/17 19:50, Daniel Margolis wrote: > But I'd appreciate feedback from the wider peanut gallery here, too. > Parsing key/value pairs isn't hard, but do people prefer that (is there a > standard parser?) versus taking a dependency on an existing JSON lib?
>From the Exim developer's point of view, I much prefer name/value pairs since we have existing code doing that. We don't have any JSON and having to add some would be one more barrier against implementing STS. -- Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
