>>>>> Brotman, Alexander <[email protected]> writes:

> Do you mean the section where the policy-string was declared?

I read the side-by-side diff and noticed that the json rfc ws no longer
in the references list, but the string json still showed up several
places.

Hense the q as to whether that change was intentional or inadvertent.

Especially since you'd added a ref the to case-insensitive rfc.  I
couldn't tell whether something typo-ish had occurred.

> It was originally there
> to explicitly reference the section about the serialization for
> including the STS policy (which was a JSON body itself, which no
> longer is the case).

But that looks like the change was intentional.

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <[email protected]>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to