On 23/10/17 19:37, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > Exim actually supports server-side SNI (mostly for port 587 I > expect), perhaps Jeremy could comment on whether Exim users > make real use of this to host multiple virtual TLS MX hosts > for port 25, and would really not want to just consolidate on > a single MX hostname.
I can't help on actual deployment numbers, sorry. The one I personally operate is small enough to not need VPS-equivalents; I'm tempted to suggest that the combination of DNS support (MX vs. A records) and the richness of hop-by-hop email processing possibilities (developed ad-hoc before and during the transition to the Internet) combined with the less-harsh latency requirements on mail vs. browsing make VPS' for email not needed. As you say, the feature is there, in Exim. It's agnostic about port-number and the purpose of the service. -- Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
