<snip>

>>
>> Can you please provide an alternate format?
> 
> I don't have cycles to draft a more formal grammar, but it should be
> done.  The TLSA part should be a JSON encoding of the RData of the
> MX host's TLSA RRSet in the form:

Victor - this draft has passed WGLC and since you're the only one who
has (so far) raised a requirement for a formal syntax here, so unless
you or somebody provides concrete suggestions *and* there is clear WG
support for the change, we are not going to spend more time on this.

This does not *exclude* making further change but we are past the
time for open-ended discussions about this document.

<snip>


> 
> No, but I don't think it is much to ask from the draft authors.
> The text can describe:


cf my comments above.

        Cheers Leif

_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to