> On Jan 31, 2018, at 2:44 PM, Keith Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> You don't violate 27 years of practice based on any number of tests that this
> WG is capable of doing, just to avoid defining two content-types.
I remain quite puzzled as to the nature of the violation.
All I see is a new media type that takes an optional parameter
which specifies that the content is gzip compressed.
The new media type has no legacy consumers, and is not suitable
for inline display by MUAs. The data is intended for aggregation
and machine analysis alongside reports from other senders.
I fail to see any interoperability concern. Perhaps, I'm missing
something. Please explain.
--
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
