On 4/17/18 3:37 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > On 17/04/18 16:22, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> During ART-ART and IESG review of draft-ietf-tram-stunbis, we realized >> that just pointing to RFC 7525 might not be enough anymore, now that the >> TLS 1.3 spec has been approved for publication. 7525bis, anyone? > > I also think it's a bit early, but no harm to start the > work, as long as it's not rushed. I'd say it'll be a while > before e.g. we see some of the 0rtt car-crashes that it'd > be good to advise against;-)
Waiting until DTLS 1.3 is finished seems like a good idea. As to car crashes, that's not the job of 7525bis - if there are problems with 0rtt, someone needs to fix TLS, not the guidelines for using it. Peter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
