I would like to suggest the following replacement for the Section 6.2
(Report Type):
OLD:
This document registers a new parameter "report-type="tlsrpt"" under
"multipart/report" top-level media type for use with [RFC6522].
The media type suitable for use as a report-type is defined in the
following section.
NEW:
This document creates a new registry for "report-type" parameter to
Content-Type header field for "multipart/report" top-level media
type defined in [RFC6522].
This registry should contain "report-type" parameter value, list of
corresponding Media Types for
document defining it and an optional comment. Registration procedure
for this should be "Specification Required".
The registry is to be populated with the following entries:
"tlsrpt", application/tlsrpt+gzip and application/tlsrpt+json,
[RFCXXXX]
"disposition-notification", message/disposition-notification, RFC 8098
"disposition-notification",
message/global-disposition-notification, RFC 6533
"delivery-status", message/delivery-status, RFC 1894
"delivery-status", message/global-delivery-status, RFC 6533
Media types suitable for use with a report-type="tlsrpt" are defined
in Sections 6.4 and 6.5.
Does this look reasonable to people?
Thank you,
Alexey
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
