> On May 8, 2018, at 12:50 PM, Leif Johansson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> For the record, I agree that the specification *could* be changed along
>> the lines discussed. I am not actively advocating for the change.
>
> but you're not violently opposed either?
Not violently opposed, provided the text makes the MX RRset processing
obligations on the sender sufficiently clear. As already noted, a bit
more care is required to not make certain mistakes.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
