Thanks! Ping me when the revised version of TLSRPT is in the draft
repository, and I'll clear this DISCUSS.
/a
On 5/10/18 09:56, Daniel Margolis wrote:
Thanks. We (as you may know) renamed "report" mode to "testing" mode
late in the review process. I have fixed the errors in TLSRPT to be
consistent with MTA-STS in our working draft.
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:49 AM Adam Roach <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this document. I intend to
ballot "yes,"
once the following issue has been resolved:
This document defines three modes: "enforce", "testing", and
"none". It is
intended to work in conjunction with draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt,
which shows the
use of "mode: report" in all of its examples.
On a quick survey of hosts I can quickly find publishing MTA-STS
records, I
find:
version: STSv1
mode: testing
mx: aspmx.l.google.com <http://aspmx.l.google.com>
mx: .aspmx.l.google.com <http://aspmx.l.google.com>
max_age: 86400
version: STSv1
mode: report
mx: mx00.emig.gmx.net <http://mx00.emig.gmx.net>
mx: mx01.emig.gmx.net <http://mx01.emig.gmx.net>
max_age: 604800
version: STSv1
mode: report
mx: mx1.comcast.net <http://mx1.comcast.net>
mx: mx2.comcast.net <http://mx2.comcast.net>
max_age: 2592000
version: STSv1
mode: report
mx: *.am0.yahoodns.net <http://am0.yahoodns.net>
max_age: 86400
The implementation confusion here appears to be real. Please
ensure that
draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt and draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts agree about
valid values
for the "mode" parameter.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
