Is there a typo in the formal definition of an MTA-STS policy in
draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-21 section 3.2?
Specifically, sts-policy-mx is not referenced from anywhere else in the
ABNF definition. It seems that this was referenced by sts-policy-field
in version 20 of the draft, but went missing in version 21. The
identifiers sts-policy-mx-label and sts-policy-mx-toplabel also seem to
be "orphaned" in this way.
Regards,
--
*Richard Gray* | Operations Technical Lead
*DDI:* +64 9 950 2196 *Fax:* +64 9 302 0518
*Mobile:* +64 21 050 8178 *Freephone:*0800 SMX SMX (769 769)
*SMX Limited:* Level 10, 19 Victoria Street West, Auckland, New Zealand
*Web:* http://smxemail.com
SMX | Cloud Email Hosting & Security
_____________________________________________________________________________
This email has been filtered by SMX. For more info visit http://smxemail.com
_____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
