Hi, while preparing shepherd write-up for the draft I came across one issue. IANA Considerations section contains the following text:
If published as an RFC, this draft requests the addition of an entry to the Permanent Message Header Field Names Registry [PermMessageHeaderFields]: Header field name: RequireTLS Applicable protocol: mail Status: provisional Author/change controller: IETF UTA Working Group Specification document: (this document) I'm not familiar with Message Header Field Names Registry, but it seems to me that this request is wrong. In particular, according to RFC 3864 the status for the Permanent Fields must be one of "standard", "experimental", "informational", "historic", "obsoleted", etc., but not "provisional", which is only appropriate for the Provisional Message Header Fields. I think that in this case it must be "standard", since the draft is Standards Track document. In addition, the Change controller must be just "IETF" (again, according to RFC 3864). Am I missing something? And note also a small typo in Section 2: s/succesfully/successfully Regards, Valery. _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
