In article <[email protected]> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On 01/09/2019 07:22 AM, John Levine wrote: >> until STS came along there was no expectation that the name the client >> used matches the cert. > >I've been seeing MUAs complain about the CN or SAN(s) not matching the >FQDN for years. Completely independent of MTA-STS.
Since MUAs don't talk to MXes, I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. R's, John _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
