On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I like the idea of a formalized place to record SNI in the Received: header, and would be happy to see a document that specifies how to do it.
Per the subsequent note, I'm sticking it in the BY header which allows a second domain name in the parens that nobody ever uses.
I could write an I-D easily enough to add a new received clause, but it has to be experimental or standards track so the process overhead is significant. Perhaps wait a while as we see how well MTA-STS works in practice.
I've yet to get any STS reports, even though a fair number of mail clients send SNI info.
Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
