--On Thursday, January 24, 2019 20:26 +0000 "Salz, Rich"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> changes the registry criteria to Expert Review so you
>> don't need to
> publish an RFC merely to register a new clause.
>
>
> Spec required, so it's written down somewhere what it means?
> An I-D is sufficient; you don't have to go through RFC
> publication. Or will these things be "intuitively obvious" ?
Rich,
As I have always understood it, "spec required" means a
published, stable, readily-accessible, etc., specification.
Not necessarily an RFC but, until the definition of an I-D is
changed to eliminate all of the "don't reference except as 'work
in progress'" and "expires in six months" stuff, it would be
unusual (and objectionable) for posting a spec as an I-D to
qualify.
john
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
