Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:50:56PM +0200, Eliot Lear wrote: > > > If this is scoped to dnsNames then I’m fine with it going forward as > > is. Other names would be problematic. > > It was my expectation/understanding all along that we're talking about > is deprecation of CN-ID fallback when the reference identifier is a > DNS-ID.
Yes, I was wondering how those very old certificates embedded in hardware waiting on shelves would work when deployed, i.e. what's the DNS setup? Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> https://dotat.at/ Shannon: East or southeast 4 to 6, occasionally 7 later. Moderate or rough. Fair. Good.
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
