Hi, I quickly looked at -06. Looks ready for WGLC. Two high level comments.
- I think QUIC should be mentioned already in section 1.1 and mentioned everytime DTLS is mentioned Otherwise the document feels old already when it is published. QUIC already makes up a huge part of internet traffic (over 25% of traffic in some ISP), and is probably already more used than DTLS. I don't see any difference between DTLS and QUIC for the purpose of this document. Both are based on the TLS handshake. - The document use both "Service Name" (title) and "Service Identity" (abbreviation). Maybe one of them is enough. Cheers, John From: Uta <[email protected]> on behalf of Salz, Rich <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, 26 May 2022 at 16:16 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Uta] I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06.txt Colleagues, With this draft we (the authors) think the document is done. We received a lot of excellent feedback and comments, and incorporated pretty much all of it. We believe this document is ready for WGLC, and ask the chairs to do that. Depending on what happens during the WGLC, we'll want one minute, or more, to present at IETF 114. On 5/26/22, 10:11 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Using TLS in Applications WG of the IETF. Title : Service Names in TLS Authors : Peter Saint-Andre Jeff Hodges Rich Salz Filename : draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06.txt Pages : 26 Date : 2022-05-26 Abstract: Many application technologies enable secure communication between two entities by means of Transport Layer Security (TLS) with Internet Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX) certificates. This document specifies procedures for representing and verifying the identity of application services in such interactions. This document obsoletes RFC 6125. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: ://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06.html A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06 Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
