Apology accepted, and the exact phrase was: "...and just a lot of pointless fist-pounding about IDNA2008. If anyone is still trying to assert authority about this after 15 years, maybe the problem is with the document"
I try to make it a policy to never talk behind anyone's back, but this is difficult to get right 100% of the time. There were people in front of the ellipsis, but they were all CCed. I'm sorry that there are weird domain names that in fact totally suck, but I didn't do it, and I have nothing to gain or lose here. thanks, Rob On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:01 PM Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im> wrote: > On 1/31/23 9:02 PM, Rob Sayre wrote: > > > You alleged that other WG participants are engaged in "pointless > > fist-pounding" driven by a desire to "assert authority" instead of > > accepting that perhaps they felt they were raising legitimate > concerns. > > > > I did write something like that in private email, and now you've made it > > public. > > > > It's pretty much the first rule of keeping things polite to not do that. > > You are right and I apologize - there were many messages having the same > subject line and I neglected to check whether that particular message > had been sent to the list. That lack of care is my fault. > > Peter > >
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
