Yes, as the document shepherd this raises questions for me on "normative" / "informative" etc...
I welcome any guidance on if this will be acceptable in its current state. OS On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 2:12 PM Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin wrote that he thought the ICANN citation needed to be more > concrete. The document at > https://features.icann.org/ssac-advisory-use-emoji-domain-names > says: > > "SSAC Advisory on the Use of Emoji in Domain Names > Resolution of the ICANN Board > Meeting Date: > Thu, 2 Nov 2017 > Resolution Number: > 2017.11.02.09 – 2017.11.02.12 > URL for Resolution: > > https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2017-11-02-en#1.e > " > > I don't see a problem with the citation as it stands, but maybe that > resolution URL would work? I think the current one is fine, though. No > strong feelings here. > > thanks, > Rob > > _______________________________________________ > Uta mailing list > Uta@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta > -- *ORIE STEELE* Chief Technical Officer www.transmute.industries <https://www.transmute.industries>
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
