Martin Thomson via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > It does not appear as though my previous review was considered in the > preparation of this revision. The bulk of the changes appear to be in > a section I did not review (Section 17, which should be a separate > document).
Correct.
We believe that we understood your point of view.
We discussed the view that all profiles create non-interoperability, and
that none of the certificate belongs, and we respectfully disagree.
We think you are in the rough on this.
But, we very much appreciated the engagement.
> I don't think it makes sense for me to review this again. If I were on
> the IESG, I would abstain.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
